Feedback from the 20 participants indicates a highly positive response to the ABAT training, with strong ratings across course quality, facilitator performance, content clarity, practical relevance, and learner confidence.
Regarding the overall quality of the course, 18 participants (90%) rated it excellent, while 2 (10%) rated it good. No participant selected average or poor, demonstrating a very high level of satisfaction with the training.
The facilitator’s knowledge and delivery received particularly strong feedback. Nineteen participants (95%) rated the facilitator, Dr. Doris Izuwah, as excellent, while one participant (5%) rated her as good. No participant expressed concerns regarding her knowledge or delivery.
The clarity and organization of the course content was also highly rated. Eighteen participants (90%) described the content as very clear, while 2 (10%) found it somewhat clear. Importantly, none considered the content confusing or very unclear.
The examples and practical scenarios were another major strength. Fifteen participants (75%) considered them extremely helpful, while 5 (25%) considered them moderately helpful. No participant found them slightly helpful or unhelpful.
The training also had a strong impact on participants’ confidence in applying ABA techniques. Eighteen participants (90%) reported being very confident, one (5%) somewhat confident, and one (5%) neutral. No participant reported being unconfident.
The main area identified for improvement was the pace of the training. Fifteen participants (75%) considered the pace appropriate, while 5 (25%) felt it was too fast. Future cohorts could benefit from additional revision periods, practical demonstrations, question-and-answer sessions, and more time for complex topics.
Regarding anticipated board examination dates, 55% of participants selected October or November 2026, indicating that most participants may require focused exam preparation and registration support during this period.
Overall, the feedback demonstrates that the ABAT training was highly successful, with strong participant satisfaction and perceived learning outcomes. Maintaining the current quality while improving pacing and practical reinforcement should further enhance future cohorts.
